Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 21425

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : KC01 - KC05 Full Version

Changing Trends in Aetiology of Amputations: A 12-year Retrospective Cross-sectional Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58193.18451
Tufail Muzaffar, Gul Junaid, Kaleem UL Haque

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 2. Resident, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Kaleem ul Haque,
Senior Resident, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SKIMS, Soura, Srinagar-190011, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
E-mail: kaleem.haque@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The Kashmir valley, which has experienced political instability since 1989, has witnessed a rise in amputations and a different aetiology compared to other parts of India. Limited data exists on the changing patterns of various causes of amputations before and after 1989 in the Kashmir valley, India.

Aim: To analyse the demographic characteristics, amputation patterns, and different causes among amputees.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Artificial Limb Centre (ALC) of Bone and Joint Hospital Barzulla, Srinagar, India. The study included 504 patients whose medical records were reviewed from 2006 to 2018 to identify the aetiology, geographical distribution, and level of amputation. Descriptive analysis was performed to determine the frequencies of various causes and levels of amputation.

Results: The study found that the most common traumatic causes of amputation were Road Traffic Accidents (RTAs), firearm injuries, and blasts. Non traumatic amputations (vascular disease and malignancies) accounted for 30% of cases. Lower limb amputations (91.5%) were more prevalent than upper limb amputations (8.5%).

Conclusion: Prior to 1989, RTA accidents were the major cause of amputations, but there was a surge in amputations caused by firearm injuries and blasts. Additionally, there has been increase in amputations caused by malignancies and dysvascular ischaemia in non traumatic causes.

Keywords

Demography, Diabetic foot, Lower extremity, Peripheral vascular disease, Prosthesis and Implants, Upper extremity, Wounds and Injuries

Amputation, a surgical procedure dating back to Hippocrates over 2500 years ago, is considered a last resort when limb salvage is not feasible (1). It is a catastrophic and irreversible act emotionally for patients and poses a significant burden on families, society, and medical services (2),(3),(4),(5). The incidence of limb amputation varies among different populations, with affluent nations primarily attributing it to Diabetes Mellitus and peripheral vascular disease, while trauma, infections, and malignancies are less common causes (6),(7),(8). Globally, peripheral vascular disease is the leading cause of amputation, with diabetes (6) accounting for approximately 80% of cases (6). Most amputations occur after the age of 60 years (7). In India (Kolkata), RTA was the primary cause of amputations in the age group below 40 years, while peripheral vascular disease was more prevalent in the age group above 40 years (7),(8). Male patients had a higher incidence of amputations compared to females. The aetiological causes of amputations exhibit significant global variations (7). Lower limb amputations account for over 90% of all amputations (8), with elbow and knee amputations being the most common within this category. Amputation trends have been observed to change globally and regionally, including in the Kashmir division where political turmoil began in 1989. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse and compare the demographic characteristics, amputation patterns, and changes in the aetiological causes among amputees, with 1989 serving as a benchmark for assessing the impact of political instability in the region.

Material and Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Artificial Limb Centre (ALC) of Bone and Joint Hospital Barzulla, Srinagar, India. The study reviewed the records of patients over a period of 12 years, from January 2006 to December 2018. All data was organised in an Excel sheet in February 2019, and data analysis was performed in June 2021. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for prosthetic treatment at the centre, and confidentiality was strictly maintained throughout the study.

Inclusion criteria: A total of 504 subjects, aged between 2 and 80 years, who received various types of prostheses at the ALC within the study duration, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with missing entries in their records were excluded from the study.

Data collection: Patient data were assessed from the medical records of amputees at the ALC. Detailed information including the year of amputation, age, gender, residence, level of amputation, and cause of amputation were thoroughly examined. The data were analysed to identify any variations in the aetiology of amputations over the decades and variations in aetiology across different districts of the state.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analysis was conducted to examine the frequencies of various aetiologies of amputation, levels of amputation, and variations in aetiology across different districts.

Results

The study included a total of 504 newly registered patients at the ALC from 2006 to 2018. Among them, 52 (10.32%) patients underwent amputation before 1989, while 452 (89.68%) underwent amputation post-1989. Of the 504 subjects, 383 (76%) were men and 121 (44%) were women. The mean age was 38.12±14.33 years. The distribution of amputations varied geographically before and after 1989. Before 1989, District Srinagar had the highest number of amputees. After 1989, there was a tremendous increase in amputees in Baramulla and Srinagar Districts, likely due to heightened militancy in those district during the first decade post-1989. Districts Anantnag, Kupwara, and Pulwama also had an increase in amputations in later decades (Table/Fig 1).

Trauma accounted for 70% of amputations, while non traumatic causes accounted for 30%. Road Traffic Accidents (RTAs) were the major cause of post-traumatic amputations (46%), followed by blast and mine injuries (21%) (Table/Fig 2). Among non traumatic causes, gangrene (47%) was the most common cause of amputation, followed by tumours (25%) and congenital limb deficiency (17%) (Table/Fig 3).

The total number of amputations due to RTAs was 160, with a higher incidence observed from 1999 to 2008, followed by a decreasing trend from 2009 to 2018. Firearm injuries caused 44 amputations, mostly happening between 1989 and 2018 (Table/Fig 4).

Among the amputations, 43 (8.5%) were upper limb amputations, while 461 (91.5%) were lower limb amputations. Left-sided amputations were performed in 253 patients, right-sided in 235 patients, and 16 patients had bilateral amputations. Transhumeral and transradial amputations were the most common for upper limb amputations, while transtibial amputations were the most common for lower limb amputations (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6).

Baramulla, Kupwara, and Srinagar had the highest number of blast victims due to increased militant activity. Srinagar also had the highest number of firearm injuries, followed by Baramulla. Anantnag had the highest number of amputations due to tumours, followed by Baramulla and Kupwara. Band-saw injuries were most frequent in Baramulla, while amputations due to leprosy were primarily seen in Srinagar (Table/Fig 7).

Burns accounted for 19 amputations, with a higher incidence in Baramulla, followed by Srinagar. Congenital limb deficiency or short limbs were present in 25 patients, with Baramulla and Kulgam contributing the highest numbers. Frostbite caused amputations in three patients, while crush injuries accounted for 40 amputations, primarily involving transtibial amputations. Other rare causes included railway accidents, polio, and snakebite. The majority of amputations (363) were performed at Bone and Joint Hospital, Barzulla. Other amputations were performed at various hospitals, including SKIMS Soura, GMC Srinagar, JVC Bemina, Delhi hospitals, Army Hospital Badami Bagh, and Kargil.

Discussion

The prevalence rate of amputees in Jammu and Kashmir was found to be 50-75 per lac people in 1982 (8), with a total of 3,000 amputees in the region. In the present study, traumatic causes accounted for 70% of amputations, with RTAs and ballistic injuries being the major contributors. Vascular diseases and malignancy were responsible for 30% of the amputations. Lower limb amputations accounted for 91.5% of the cases, while upper limb amputations made up 8.5%.

A study conducted in the Jammu division of the Union Territory (UT) found a male-to-female ratio of 7:1, whereas in the present study, it was 3:1 (1). In the Jammu study, 30% of amputations were traumatic, while 70% were non traumatic. RTAs were the most common cause of trauma. In Kashmir, in addition to RTAs, mine and blast injuries, and firearm injuries were major causes of traumatic amputation. Non traumatic causes such as Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), diabetes, tumours, and infections were also major contributors to amputations in the Kashmir division.

The major causes of amputation in India have shown a changing trend over the years. In 1983, leprosy, RTA injuries, and agricultural injuries were the major causes (8). However, by 2013, trauma, peripheral vascular disease, and malignancy became the new major causes of amputations (9). In a study conducted in South India in 2017, diabetic foot and vascular insufficiency accounted for 84% of cases, with trauma being the most important indication for amputation in younger individuals. The incidence of amputations was higher in men compared to women (2). In a study conducted in Pakistan, complications of diabetes were the most common cause of non traumatic limb amputations, while trauma was the leading cause overall (3). An Iranian study found that trauma was the most common cause of amputation, followed by diabetes and dysvascular causes (10).

In the United States, dysvascular causes were implicated in 82% of limb loss, while trauma and malignancy showed a decreasing trend (6),(11). In England, a study found that diabetes and peripheral vascular disease were the leading causes of major lower limb amputations, followed by trauma, neoplasms, and unclassified causes (5),(12). Overall, the causes of amputation vary across different regions and countries. Trauma, diabetes, and dysvascular causes are consistently identified as major contributors to amputations. Understanding the specific causes and trends in each region can help inform preventive measures and improve treatment options for amputees. Another study conducted in England from 2003-2009 by Ahmad N et al., aimed to examine the prevalence, regional variation, and relationship with revascularisation, social deprivation, and risk factors (13). The study looked at the prevalence of major lower limb amputation and revascularisation in different regions of England. It was found that the prevalence was higher in men than women and higher in the North region than in the South. Amputees in Northern England were more likely to experience social deprivation, cigarette smoking, CVD’s but astonishingly had lower levels of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Amputations following revascularisation procedures were more common in the North than in Midlands and Southern England.

In an extended study by Ahmad N et al., covering a total of 10 years from 2003 to 2013, the prevalence of major limb amputations in diabetics versus non diabetics was examined (4). The study found that a total of 42,294 amputations were performed, with 54% being above-knee and 46% below-knee amputations. The rate of major amputations in diabetics was six times higher than in those without diabetes. Men were twice as likely to undergo major amputation procedures compared to women. A study conducted in Canada by Kayssi A et al., found that diabetic complications accounted for 81% of amputations, followed by cardiovascular diseases at 6% and malignancy at 3% (14). The majority of amputations in the study were below-knee amputations. A global study by McDonald CL et al., estimated that approximately 57.7 million people worldwide had undergone limb amputations for traumatic causes (15). Falls were the most common cause of amputations, and conflict and terrorism played a significant role in unilateral lower limb amputations in adults. In children aged 5-14 years, conflict and terrorism accounted for one-third of all unilateral lower limb amputations globally. South Asia was found to have the second-highest prevalence of traumatic amputations. A comparison of the findings in the present study with other studies is shown in (Table/Fig 8) (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(10),(13),(14).

These studies highlight the prevalence and causes of amputations in different regions and populations. Factors such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and traumatic events play significant roles in the occurrence of amputations. Understanding these trends and risk factors is crucial in developing preventive strategies and improving treatment outcomes for amputees.

Limitation(s)

One limitation of this study is that the Assisted Limb Centre (ALC) only provides basic types of prostheses to patients. This means that patients who were seeking high-end prostheses were not included in the study. This could potentially skew the results and limit the generalisability of the findings. Another limitation was that the study only focused on patients who were using prostheses post-amputation. Patients who chose not to use prostheses were not included in the study. This could introduce a bias in the results and overlook important insights into the experiences and needs of this particular group of patients. These limitations should be considered when interpreting the findings of the study and may impact the overall understanding of the prevalence, causes, and outcomes of amputations in the population. Future research should aim to include a more diverse range of patients, including those seeking high-end prostheses and those who do not use prostheses, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.

Conclusion

In contrast to the rest of the world and India, the causes of amputations in the Kashmir Valley differ. RTAs, mines and blasts, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, firearm injuries, and tumours were identified as the major causes of amputations in this region. Traumatic amputations are primarily preventable injuries, and understanding the common injury mechanisms can help inform preventive measures. Non traumatic causes, such as diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and tumours, can be prevented through early screening, lifestyle modifications, and the prevention of complications. By focusing on these preventive measures, the incidence of amputations in the Kashmir Valley can potentially be reduced. It is important to consider these findings and implement appropriate strategies to address the specific causes of amputations in this region. By doing so, it may be possible to decrease the burden of amputations and improve the overall well-being of individuals in the Kashmir Valley.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to express their heartfelt gratitude to the staff of the ALC for their exceptional dedication and care provided to the patients. Their hard work and commitment have made a significant difference in the lives of those under their care. Additionally, authors extend their thanks to the ICRC for their invaluable support in facilitating the logistical operations of the centre. Their assistance has been instrumental in ensuring the smooth functioning of our facility. Authors sincerely appreciate the efforts of everyone involved in this endeavor and recognise their contributions in delivering quality healthcare services.

References

1.
Mehreen M, Nadeem A, Abedullah B, Bangroo FA, Singh DM, Singh R. Current trends of major lower limb amputations at a tertiary care centre of Jammu. Int J Med Sci Res Pract. 2015;2(2):77-80.
2.
Unnikrishnan EP, Rollands R, Parambil SM. Epidemiology of major limb amputations: A cross-sectional study from a South Indian Tertiary Care Hospital. Int Surg J. 2017;4(5):1642-46. [crossref]
3.
Jawaid M, Ali I, Kaimkhani GM. Current indications for major lower limb amputations at civil hospital, Karachi. J Surg. 2007;24(4):228-30.
4.
Ahmad N, Thomas GN, Gill P, Torella F. The prevalence of major lower limb amputation in the diabetic and non-diabetic population of England 2003-2013. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2016;13(5):348-53. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Moxey PW, Hofman D, Hinchliffe RJ, Jones K, Thompson MM, Holt PJE. Epidemiological study of lower limb amputation in England between 2003 and 2008. Br J Surg. 2010;97(9):1348-53. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: Epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J. 2002;95:875-83. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Unwin N. Epidemiology of lower extremity amputation in centres in Europe, North America and East Asia. Br J Surg. 2000;87(3):328-37. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Mohan D. A report on amputees in India. Orthotics and Prosthtics. 1986;40(1):16-32.
9.
Pooja G Das, Sangeeta L. Prevalence and aetiology of amputation in Kolkata, India: A retrospective analysis. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2013;31(1):36-40. [crossref]
10.
Sarvestani AS, Azam AT. Amputation: A ten-year survey. Trauma Mon. 2013;18(3):126-29. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Behroozian A, Beckman JA. Microvascular disease increases amputation in patients with peripheral artery disease. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2020;40(3):534-40. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Ziegler-Graham K, Mackenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):422-29. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Ahmad N, Thomas GN, Gill P, Chan C, Torella F. Lower limb amputation in England: Prevalence, regional variation and relationship with revascularisation, deprivation and risk factors. A retrospective review of hospital data. J R Soc Med. 2014;107(12):483-89.[crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kayssi A, De Mestral C, Forbes TL, Roche-Nagle G. A Canadian population- based description of the indications for lower-extremity amputations and outcomes. Can J Surg. 2016;59(2):99-106. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Mcdonald CL, Westcott-McCoy S, Weaver MR, Haagsma J, Kartin D. Global prevalence of traumatic non-fatal limb amputation. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2021;45(2):105-14.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58193.18451

Date of Submission: Jun 02, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jul 06, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 13, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 09, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 07, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 12, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com